The open letter contends that by maintaining legal domestic markets for endangered species, Chinese Government policy is acting contrary to the urgent need to reduce demand and is instead legitimising consumption of these and other threatened species. Read the full letter below:
November 18, 2020
Dear Members of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress,
The undersigned, comprising 27 wildlife conservation organisations from around the world, call upon China’s National People Congress to take a crucial step in reducing demand for threatened wildlife by further amending the Wildlife Protection Law
of the People’s Republic of China to prohibit any commercial exploitation of threatened wild animal species.
The biodiversity crisis threatens the life support systems upon which we all depend, and is increasing the risk of future pandemics. Governments must take strong action now to prevent runaway ecosystem collapse, including tackling illegal and unsustainable trade which is a major driver of the crisis. As the host of the 15th
Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD CoP15) in 2021, it is crucial that China demonstrate leadership in these efforts.
We commend the Chinese Government’s decision in early 2020 to amend the Wildlife Protection Law
in recognition of the biodiversity and public health risks of commercial trade in wild animals. We are encouraged by proposed amendments contained in the revision draft published in late October 2020 which would prohibit consumption of wild animals as food and improve enforcement of laws to protect wildlife. However, we are very disappointed that the revised Law would still permit commercial breeding and trade of threatened and protected wild animal species for non-food purposes such as traditional medicine and ornamental items.
We are concerned that species whose body parts are currently traded legally in China, including pangolins
, leopards, tiger, bears and elephants, are seriously threatened by high levels of poaching and trafficking; China moreover represents a major source of demand for these species. In maintaining legal domestic markets in these and other species, Chinese Government policy is acting contrary to the urgent need to reduce demand and is instead legitimising consumption. We note also that legal trade mechanisms in threatened wildlife are frequently subject to abuse, enabling laundering of illegally sourced wild animal products onto legal markets.
We are also concerned that for species which are threatened by trade, legal trade in captive-bred specimens frequently exacerbates threats to wild populations by stimulating demand, complicating law enforcement and providing opportunities for laundering of illegally sourced specimens.
In addition, we are concerned that permitting commercial breeding, trade and consumption of wild animals for traditional medicine and other purposes while strictly prohibiting consumption as food could undermine commendable policy changes aimed at reducing disease risk from wildlife trade.
Many of us come from and work in countries where tigers and leopards still survive in the wild, and we are battling every day to protect our big cats from poachers who supply illegal trade. We urge you to support our efforts by prohibiting trade in threatened wild animals such as tigers and other Asian big cats, elephants, pangolins, bears and rhinos, including from captive sources. This would also bring China’s legislation into compliance with key decisions and recommendations adopted by the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
We therefore urge members of China’s National People’s Congress to make further amendments to the Wildlife Protection Law
to, at a minimum, prohibit domestic commercial trade in the parts and derivatives of threatened wild animal species, including from captive sources; extend prohibitions on trade and consumption of wild animals as food to other forms of consumption, including traditional medicine; prohibit captive breeding of threatened species for commercial purposes; and prohibit auction of seized specimens of threatened wild animal species.
We believe that a failure to adopt these amendments would represent a grave missed opportunity to take much-needed action to reduce illegal and unsustainable wildlife trade. This would moreover risk undermining both China’s leadership in biodiversity conservation as the host of CBD CoP15 and the commendable ambition displayed in other elements of the revised Wildlife Protection Law.
Sanctuary Nature Foundation
Animal Defenders International
Big Cat Rescue
Born Free Foundation
CATCA Environmental and Wildlife Society
Center for Biological Diversity
Centre for Wildlife Studies
The Corbett Foundation
David Shepherd Wildlife Foundation
Defenders of Wildlife
Earth League International
Education for Nature – Vietnam
Elephant Reintegration Trust
Environmental Investigation Agency
Fauna & Flora International
Global Law Alliance for Animals and the Environment
Humane Society International
International Aid for Animals Foundation
International Primate Protection League
Oceanic Preservation Society
Pan African Sanctuary Alliance
Shark Research Institute
Wildlife Conservation Trust (India)
Wildlife Protection Society of India